financial advisory and insurance
EB-2 National Interest Waiver — Merits Decision
Underlying petition: DENIED · Service Center Operations (SCOPS)
Legal elements discussed — Matter of Dhanasar
Prong 1 — Substantial Merit & National Importance
FAILPetitioner argued: proposed endeavor would have significant potential to employ U.S. workers or substantial positive economic effects
Evidence type: business plan, assertions
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) finding: INSUFFICIENT
“the record does not establish that the Petitioner's endeavor 'has significant potential to employ U.S. workers or has other substantial positive economic effects'”
Decision PDF, p. 5Open source PDF
Petitioner argued: proposed endeavor has national importance due to alignment with U.S. government initiatives and broad economic impact
Evidence type: business plan, letters, assertions
USCIS finding: INSUFFICIENT
“the record does not establish its national importance.”
Decision PDF, p. 2Open source PDF
Petitioner argued: proposed endeavor would have national impact on financial literacy, inclusion, fraud prevention, etc.
Evidence type: RFE response, assertions
USCIS finding: INSUFFICIENT
“the Petitioner did not describe in detail the strategies and initiatives he would design, nor how they would specifically improve access to essential financial tools”
Decision PDF, p. 4Open source PDF
Prong 2 — Well Positioned to Advance the Endeavor
NOT_DISCUSSEDProng 3 — Balancing the Waiver's Benefits
NOT_DISCUSSEDWhat this decision can’t tell you
This decision comes from a case that was denied and then appealed. Every case here is in that position — it cannot be used to estimate an overall approval rate, and it cannot predict the outcome of any individual case, including yours. USCIS officers exercise discretion on facts that are never fully captured in a written decision.
This decision turned on national importance. Describe your own work and see which decisions discussed the same issue.
Describe your situation →Related decisions
Questions this raises for your lawyer
- On Prong 1 (substantial merit & national importance), USCIS found the petitioner's business plan, assertions insufficient to establish that proposed endeavor would have significant potential to employ U.S. workers or substantial positive economic effects. What would make comparable evidence in my own case more persuasive?
- What in my own case most resembles the specific facts USCIS focused on in this decision?
- Would additional expert-opinion evidence have changed the outcome here, based on what USCIS said was missing?