facility management

EB-2 National Interest Waiver — Merits Decision

2026-02-02·DISMISSED·IN RE: 41018270

Underlying petition: DENIED · Service Center Operations (SCOPS)

Legal elements discussed — Matter of Dhanasar

Prong 1 — Substantial Merit & National Importance

FAIL

Petitioner argued: model has documented third-party demand via letters of intent

Evidence type: letters of intent

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) finding: INSUFFICIENT

they do not provide sufficient information to demonstrate her endeavor would have the significant economic or broader impacts claimed

Decision PDF, p. 4Open source PDF

Petitioner argued: proposed endeavor has national importance due to addressing urgent need for resilient infrastructure management

Evidence type: articles and reports

USCIS finding: INSUFFICIENT

they do not establish with specificity how the Petitioner's work would impact these areas to show its national importance

Decision PDF, p. 3Open source PDF

Petitioner argued: expert opinion that endeavor is nationally important

Evidence type: expert opinion letter

USCIS finding: INSUFFICIENT

his opinion is general in nature and does not meaningfully address the details of the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor

Decision PDF, p. 5Open source PDF

Petitioner argued: successful pilot with 32% reduction in costs and $2.8 million savings

Evidence type: support letters and slide decks

USCIS finding: INSUFFICIENT

aside from her own assertions, she has provided little objective, supporting evidence to corroborate her claims

Decision PDF, p. 4Open source PDF

Prong 2 — Well Positioned to Advance the Endeavor

NOT_DISCUSSED

Prong 3 — Balancing the Waiver's Benefits

NOT_DISCUSSED

What this decision can’t tell you

This decision comes from a case that was denied and then appealed. Every case here is in that position — it cannot be used to estimate an overall approval rate, and it cannot predict the outcome of any individual case, including yours. USCIS officers exercise discretion on facts that are never fully captured in a written decision.

This decision turned on national importance. Describe your own work and see which decisions discussed the same issue.

Describe your situation →

Related decisions

Questions this raises for your lawyer

  • On Prong 1 (substantial merit & national importance), USCIS found the petitioner's letters of intent insufficient to establish that model has documented third-party demand via letters of intent. What would make comparable evidence in my own case more persuasive?
  • What in my own case most resembles the specific facts USCIS focused on in this decision?
  • Would additional expert-opinion evidence have changed the outcome here, based on what USCIS said was missing?
See similar decisionsHow this data was built