electromechanical systems
EB-2 National Interest Waiver — Merits Decision
Underlying petition: DENIED · —
Legal elements discussed — Matter of Dhanasar
Prong 1 — Substantial Merit & National Importance
FAILPetitioner argued: The Petitioner's work will have broader implications in her field and substantial positive economic effects.
Evidence type: personal statement, expert letters
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) finding: INSUFFICIENT
“Here, the record does not include adequate corroborating evidence, to show that the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor offers broader implications in her field, enhancements to U.S. societal welfare, or substantial positive economic effects for the country that rise to the level of national importance.”
Decision PDF, p. 5Open source PDF
Petitioner argued: The Petitioner's proposed endeavor has national importance because it will support key U.S. priorities by improving user experience in advanced electronics, promoting sustainable energy practices in transportation, and strengthening safety and reliability in aviation systems.
Evidence type: expert letters, recommendation letters, industry reports
USCIS finding: INSUFFICIENT
“However, these assertions are not supported by concrete examples or detailed explanations demonstrating the Petitioner's proposed endeavor's national importance.”
Decision PDF, p. 4Open source PDF
Prong 2 — Well Positioned to Advance the Endeavor
NOT_DISCUSSEDProng 3 — Balancing the Waiver's Benefits
NOT_DISCUSSEDWhat this decision can’t tell you
This decision comes from a case that was denied and then appealed. Every case here is in that position — it cannot be used to estimate an overall approval rate, and it cannot predict the outcome of any individual case, including yours. USCIS officers exercise discretion on facts that are never fully captured in a written decision.
This decision turned on national importance. Describe your own work and see which decisions discussed the same issue.
Describe your situation →Related decisions
Questions this raises for your lawyer
- On Prong 1 (substantial merit & national importance), USCIS found the petitioner's personal statement, expert letters insufficient to establish that the Petitioner's work will have broader implications in her field and substantial positive economic effects.. What would make comparable evidence in my own case more persuasive?
- What in my own case most resembles the specific facts USCIS focused on in this decision?
- Would additional expert-opinion evidence have changed the outcome here, based on what USCIS said was missing?