veterinary pathology

EB-2 National Interest Waiver — Merits Decision

2025-11-19·REMANDED·IN RE: 39968535

Underlying petition: DENIED · Service Center Operations (SCOPS)

Legal elements discussed — Matter of Dhanasar

Prong 1 — Substantial Merit & National Importance

FAIL

Petitioner argued: The proposed endeavor has national importance due to implications for public health and veterinary medicine.

Evidence type: recommendation letters, government publications, industry articles

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) finding: INSUFFICIENT

SCOPS concluded that the evidence did not include information about the endeavor's national importance

Decision PDF, p. 2Open source PDF

Prong 2 — Well Positioned to Advance the Endeavor

PASS

Petitioner argued: The petitioner is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor based on her publication and citation record and grant awards.

Evidence type: publications, citations, grants

USCIS finding: INSUFFICIENT

the evidence submitted does not sufficiently demonstrate that the Petitioner is well positioned to independently secure funding or lead the advancement of her proposed endeavor.

Decision PDF, p. 4Open source PDF

Prong 3 — Balancing the Waiver's Benefits

FAIL

Petitioner argued: Waiving the job offer requirement would benefit the United States.

Evidence type: not specified

USCIS finding: INSUFFICIENT

she had not demonstrated her proposed endeavor's national importance or that, on balance, it would be beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirements.

Decision PDF, p. 2Open source PDF

What this decision can’t tell you

This decision comes from a case that was denied and then appealed. Every case here is in that position — it cannot be used to estimate an overall approval rate, and it cannot predict the outcome of any individual case, including yours. USCIS officers exercise discretion on facts that are never fully captured in a written decision.

This decision turned on national importance. Describe your own work and see which decisions discussed the same issue.

Describe your situation →

Related decisions

Questions this raises for your lawyer

  • On Prong 1 (substantial merit & national importance), USCIS found the petitioner's recommendation letters, government publications, industry articles insufficient to establish that the proposed endeavor has national importance due to implications for public health and veterinary medicine.. What would make comparable evidence in my own case more persuasive?
  • On Prong 3 (balancing the waiver's benefits), USCIS found the petitioner's not specified insufficient to establish that waiving the job offer requirement would benefit the United States.. What would make comparable evidence in my own case more persuasive?
  • What in my own case most resembles the specific facts USCIS focused on in this decision?
See similar decisionsHow this data was built