fitness and health

EB-2 National Interest Waiver — Merits Decision

2024-12-11·DISMISSED·IN RE: 34547094

Underlying petition: DENIED · Nebraska Service Center

Legal elements discussed — Matter of Dhanasar

Prong 1 — Substantial Merit & National Importance

FAIL

Petitioner argued: The endeavor is innovative and sets a new standard for personalized fitness solutions.

Evidence type: letters in the record

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) finding: INSUFFICIENT

the Petitioner has not sufficiently established particular innovation in the services he offers to his clients, the extent to which his endeavor is distinguishable from others in the field, and how these innovations would have national implications in the field of health and fitness.

Decision PDF, p. 3Open source PDF

Petitioner argued: The endeavor has substantial potential for economic impact including contributions to GDP, tax revenues, and employment.

Evidence type: profit and employment figures, projections

USCIS finding: INSUFFICIENT

the Petitioner has not submitted documentation demonstrating these projections result in benefits to the regional or national economy to the level of 'substantial positive economic effects'

Decision PDF, p. 3Open source PDF

Petitioner argued: The endeavor aligns with national health priorities and has broader impact through expert opinion, support letters, client testimonials, and business plan.

Evidence type: expert opinion and support letters, client testimonials, business plan

USCIS finding: INSUFFICIENT

the Petitioner has not demonstrated his contributions to the health and fitness field has a wider impact beyond his own business and clients, and at a level commensurate with national importance.

Decision PDF, p. 3Open source PDF

Prong 2 — Well Positioned to Advance the Endeavor

NOT_DISCUSSED

Prong 3 — Balancing the Waiver's Benefits

NOT_DISCUSSED

What this decision can’t tell you

This decision comes from a case that was denied and then appealed. Every case here is in that position — it cannot be used to estimate an overall approval rate, and it cannot predict the outcome of any individual case, including yours. USCIS officers exercise discretion on facts that are never fully captured in a written decision.

This decision turned on national importance. Describe your own work and see which decisions discussed the same issue.

Describe your situation →

Related decisions

Questions this raises for your lawyer

  • On Prong 1 (substantial merit & national importance), USCIS found the petitioner's letters in the record insufficient to establish that the endeavor is innovative and sets a new standard for personalized fitness solutions.. What would make comparable evidence in my own case more persuasive?
  • What in my own case most resembles the specific facts USCIS focused on in this decision?
  • Would additional expert-opinion evidence have changed the outcome here, based on what USCIS said was missing?
See similar decisionsHow this data was built